Evaluating Cardiothoracic Ratio (CTR) and Its Correlation with Clinical Indications and Body Parameters for Heart Size Assessment in Resource-Limited Settings: A Cross-sectional Study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/gv087c32Keywords:
Cardiomegaly, Cardiothoracic Ratio, Body Mass Index, Body Surface Area, Body Surface IndexAbstract
Introduction
Cardiologists must always determine heart size, which varies with physiological changes. Advanced measurement techniques are costly and often inaccessible to the common man. Measuring the cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) using Chest X-rays (CXR) is a common and more affordable option, but there's a need for even cheaper alternatives. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the relationship between CTR and presenting clinical indications and to relate CTR to the body parameters to find an appropriate relationship that can be utilized in low-resource facilities in determining heart size.
Methodology:
This cross-sectional study involved 386 patients undergoing CXR at Mulago National Specialized Hospital's radiology department. Data were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Associations between the CTR and independent variables were analyzed using Pearson’s chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, Spearman’s correlation coefficient, simple linear regression, and multivariate regression. Statistical significance was set at a p-value of < 0.05.
Results:
The median CTR was 0.46, with an interquartile range of 0.42 to 0.50. Female patients had a higher CTR than males. Significant positive correlations were found between CTR and BMI (p < 0.001, correlation 0.21), BSA (p = 0.016, correlation 0.12), and BSI (p < 0.001, correlation 0.19). The relationship between CTR and BSA showed a fair performance as a predictive tool, with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 29.2%, 86.0%, 63.6%, and 59.0% for males, and 8.3%, 98.1%, 75.0%, and 60.7% for females, respectively. Thus, BSA was considered a relatively better predictor of CTR.
Conclusion:
BSA shows a moderately good relationship with CTR, while the influence of body habitus on CTR is minimal. Thus, using body parameters to predict CTR should be approached cautiously.
Recommendation:
We recommend conducting a similar study on a more diverse general population.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alen Musisi, Rebecca Nakatudde, Oliver Namuwonge, Deborah Babirye, Ismail Kintu, Francis Olweny, Richard Malumba, Victoria Nakalanzi, Aloysius Gonzaga Mubuuke (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
